A recent Georgia court verdict awarded $16.2 million to a young boy who suffered severe injuries after being run over by an Amazon Logistics delivery van. The case, Bradfield v. Amazon Logistics, et al., sheds light on the question of corporate responsibility in delivery accidents, raising important considerations for companies like Amazon that rely on third-party logistics. The verdict also highlights the critical need for companies to ensure comprehensive driver safety training and proper oversight of their delivery contractors. This article provides a summary of the case and its implications for Amazon and other companies that employ third-party delivery drivers.
The accident took place as the boy was crossing a neighborhood street on an electric bike. He was struck and run over by a delivery van operated by Fly Fella Logistics, an Amazon delivery service partner. The collision caused severe injuries, including a fractured pelvis and a degloving injury requiring multiple skin grafts and resulting in lifelong scarring.
In the trial, Amazon Logistics was assigned 85% of the liability for negligent training, while 10% was attributed to Fly Fella Logistics and the delivery driver, Jowann Cowan. An additional 5% liability was attributed to a non-party neighbor who had agreed to supervise the child. Ultimately, the jury awarded $16 million for pain and suffering and $206,000 for medical expenses.
A significant issue in the trial centered on Amazon’s degree of control over its delivery partners, with the plaintiff’s attorneys arguing that Amazon’s involvement in Fly Fella Logistics’ operations made it liable for the driver’s actions. According to testimony, Amazon controlled various elements of Fly Fella’s delivery operations, including driver wages and specific delivery procedures, suggesting a level of employer control.
The plaintiff’s attorney argued that Amazon failed to provide Cowan with necessary driver safety training, which could have helped prevent the accident. He noted that Amazon only implemented a safety training program after the crash. The attorney argued that Amazon’s oversight responsibilities should have included proper training on how to handle situations involving children. Amazingly, the driver involved in the accident was scheduled to deliver to over 180 addresses in a single shift. Many of those addresses have more than one package delivered during that shift. Amazon’s business practices require the driver to deliver an unreasonable number of stops racing through residential neighborhoods where our children play that are likely to result in serious accidents just like this one. Ti is not a matter of if an accident will occur but rather when and how seriously someone will be hurt due to dangerous way that Amazon operates its business.
If you or a loved one has been involved in a delivery truck or van accident, it’s essential to consult an experienced Amazon accident lawyer who understands the complexities of corporate liability in these cases. Coffey McPharlin’s Amazon truck accident lawyers have extensive experience navigating such cases and are dedicated to helping victims secure the compensation they deserve.
In their defense, Amazon’s attorneys argued that the supervising neighbor bore some responsibility for allowing the child access to an electric bike intended for older riders. The defense also contended that Cowan acted reasonably, having stopped initially to allow other children to cross before accelerating. However, the plaintiffs argued that Cowan should have exercised greater caution and noticed the boy in the roadway.
During the trial, Amazon attempted to settle the case with a last-minute offer, which the child’s father ultimately rejected. The plaintiffs expressed frustration with Amazon’s refusal to mediate before trial and described the company’s litigation strategy as overly aggressive. Unfortunately, this is a common strategy employed by companies like Amazon. The offers often are made late and this delay by a company that should fully understand the harms and losses that it has caused does this as a matter of strategy to wear down the victim. The trial lawyers at Coffey McPharlin level the playing field for the victims of truck accidents. While most cases are resolved through settlement we have the experience and resources to take on companies like Amazon leveling the playing field and giving our clients the advantage.
This verdict underscores an important precedent for liability in delivery truck and van accidents. Companies like Amazon that partner with third-party logistics services may still be held accountable for the actions of contracted drivers if they exercise significant control over delivery operations. This case illustrates the critical need for comprehensive driver training and strict safety protocols, especially for companies involved in high-volume delivery services.
For those affected by delivery accidents involving companies like Amazon, working with an experienced Amazon van accident lawyer is essential to navigate complex liability issues and pursue fair compensation. The team at Coffey McPharlin understands the unique challenges of these cases and is committed to advocating for victims of corporate negligence.
Delivery truck accidents can result in severe injuries, and determining liability can be complicated when multiple parties are involved. If you or a loved one has been injured in a delivery truck or van accident, you need a dedicated and knowledgeable legal team on your side. Contact Coffey McPharlin today to speak with an experienced Amazon accident lawyer who can help you understand your rights and pursue the compensation you deserve.
For more information about Amazon truck accident cases, visit Coffey McPharlin Amazon Truck Accident or call (954) 289-6316 for a free consultation.